I have to write an essay, but I don't know where to start! Got same problem?
No, I know what to write!
Oh, yeah!
Introduction
South Park and an Open Society is an article written by David Valleau and Gerald J. Erion Curtis which talks about the need for a society to be open for it thrives and experience growth. South Park is discussed in this article and its efforts to promote a society that is open since this allows the creators to express their needs either in speech or inactions. It also talks about a philosopher, Karl Popper. Popper argues for an open rather than a closed society. This paper will summarize the article South Park and an Open Society by David Valleau and Gerald.
The Open Society by David Valleau and Gerald J. Erion
The article South Park and the Open Society was written by two authors: David Valleau and Gerald J. Erion. The article is about an “open society” and how our society ought to be open in order not only to grow but also thrive as well as its people. The article generally talks about what goes on in the popular television show South Park including the use of vulgar language, religious, political, and racial comments to what he calls “potty humor.”
The article opens by narrating how South Park is an open society and how it promotes the same. At South Park, creators are allowed to carry out almost whatever they want to. The authors present extremist views to the audience in an extreme way as well. Although it seems that South Park does take it over the line and offends some people, the authors say that people need to look beyond the crude humor and see what exactly the show is trying to tell us. Therefore, South Park awakens our inner sense of what is going on in such a society by the use of humor that targets haters the air limit.
You can buy informative essay help on this or any other topic at our service!
The authors then concentrate on Karl Popper. Karl Popper was an Australian philosopher born in 1902 and is credited with making the most important contributions to open societies and totalitarian governments. Popper compares two systems, open and closed systems, and concludes that closed societies are not open to critics. He, therefore, concludes that closed societies are not open to change and hence cannot adapt to a changing society. He says that in closed societies, shows like South Park could not be in existence. Unlike in a closed society, an open society allows challenges on such topics as religion, government, and political criticism. According to Popper, an open society cannot only change but thrive in a changing society. Popper believes that people will only grow positively if they challenge the daily norms they are used to.
Conclusion
The article talks mainly about a closed versus an open society as experienced in South Park. In South Park, an open society is preferred to a closed one since it would be banned later. An open society is believed to be that which gives its citizens freedom whilst the closed one is characterized by a totalitarian regime which however has only one main purpose in that it provides security hence protecting its citizens from corruption. I would, as others also, prefer an open society instead of a closed one which is likely to deny me individuality and my rights.
Related essays
It is worth to use this essay site to order custom academic papers here. I ordered lots of my papers here and all of them were written professionally! I did not even expect such high quality of writing!
I cannot thank you enough for the perfect work
Please thank writer #447 for me. The essay on today’s political climate was riveting! This writer did such an excellent job that I got a perfect score. Thanks a million.
My writer reviewed my thesis from the very beginning to the end and really cleaned up the grammar. I also took his suggestions about some sequencing issues, and it flowed so much better. I am continuing my graduate work and shall be back for more assistance!
I was pretty much stuck on my thesis proposal, but you were able to hook me up with a researcher who did the ground work for me. My proposal was accepted and I am on my feet now. Good job.