I have to write an essay, but I don't know where to start! Got same problem?
No, I know what to write!
Oh, yeah!
Introduction
The 12 angry men was a film acted where the jury consisted of 12 men who would give a verdict on the guilt or innocence of the accused. The film has been used in studies to help teach on matters of groups and team bonding, as well as, the various art of negotiation persuasion and functioning of the criminal justice system. This article checks whether the film is an effective teaching tool.
The 12 Angry Men Background
The 12 angry men consisted of people who were from different backgrounds and careers to form the jury in a homicide trial. The film elicited various reactions from the way there seem to be transformation of views from guilty to not guilty. As the case continued and with the evidence put forth the jury had clear verdict of guilty with the exception of one dissenting voice. They had to agree on the verdict with all the time placed on their proposal. They later in the end through discussions, persuasions and different viewpoints agreed to hand not guilty verdict.
There are different scholars who studied the reactions of the film characters and concluded that the film is useful in teaching on team bonding, critical thinking and events shaping the juries in criminal cases. The film shows the art of bargaining and team building. Schwarz (2002) comments that the jury started as individuals in a group with each thinking their own way but through the time they spent arguing out the evidence to prove reasonable doubts, they became a team. They changed from thinking personal to thinking as a team with the goal of finalizing the case to do justice and fair trial. This film is an eclipse of what groups pass through to attain bonding into a formidable team.
Conclusion
The jury in 12 angry men indicates the reaction from the minority when they oppose dismissal due to their weakness in numbers. The one dissenting voice from the initial verdict presumed as guilty did change the overall verdict of the jury. The art of persuasion articulated in the jury showed that even the hard to crack opinions need to be persuaded and would change their views.
Order Now
Live ChatRelated essays
- Comparative Essay: From Old Times on the Mississippi and A White Heron
- “Animal Liberation”, “Practical Ethics” and “Practical Ethics”
- The New Geography of Jobs
Dear Essays-Writer.net, You handled my rush order beautifully. I am still amazed by the quality of the term paper, because your writers didn’t have a whole lot of time to write it. Still, they did a great job and I’m happy that I chose Essays-Writer.net. Thank you for taking care of this in such an eloquent way.
Dear Essays-Writer.net, It was 3 a.m. on New Year’s Day this year, and I had a question about a very important paper that I had ordered. I thought there would be no way for me to speak to anyone, when I remembered a crucial detail that I had left out, but I dialed the number anyway. You can imagine my surprise when one of your great customer service officers picked up the phone and proceeded to help me out. I was very impressed by this! I have since learned that your customer service department stays open all the time, even during holidays and in the middle of the night. You obviously understand that your student customers need things like this. Please allow me to express my appreciation. You do outstanding work, and your customer service is unsurpassed.
I just cannot find the right words to describe this essay writing provider. Everything is awesome here. Thank you!
You just wrote another excellent paper for me. I knew that you would. You always do. Essays-Writer.net is the one company I can count on when it comes to quality writing and reliable customer service. Best wishes!
My writer did a good job, but there were problems with the bibliography. Lisa, from the customer support department, got right on it, and it was re-done in the correct format. Overall, I was pleased with both the product and the service.