Sociological perspectives such as structural functionalism, conflict theory, and interactionism have been applied to the war on terrorism (Mooney et al., 2012).
Structural Functionalist Perspective
Focuses on the functions that suggest that war should not exist unless its impact can be characterized as positive force. War against terrorism has been consolidated among small autonomous groups into larger political states. It also produces unity as well as cohesion among societal members by giving them a “common cause” and “a common enemy”. For instance, in America, societies have been consolidated for a common cause to fight against terrorism like the show of patriotism to their country (Mooney et al., 2012).
Symbolic Interactionism Perspective
Focuses on how meaning and various definitions are interrelated with the attitudes and behaviors concerning war and its conflicts. Consequently, it embraces the development of opinions and attitudes that uphold war on terrorism. This social perspective explains how military as well as civilians develop a mind set for war on terrorism by defining terrorism and its consequences (Mooney et al., 2012).
Many governments and military officials convince the public that the only way to ensure peace is to be prepared for the war on terrorism. For instance, in the American society, patriotism is the popular sentiment which the citizens should be prepared to have during times of war against terrorism. Governments use propaganda as well as appeals to patriotism so as to generate support for war efforts and motivate individuals to join armed forces in order to boost the war on terrorism (Mooney et al., 2012).
Conflict Theory Perspective
Stresses that the society is composed of groups competing with each other for scarce resources. For instance, terrorism competes with the society for such resources as well as has a negative impact on it. As a result, governments consolidate their military forces to fight against terrorism in order to protect and maintain control over the natural resources of a nation or society (Leming, 1989).
- Social Rights USA
- Race in Our Everyday Lives
- Discrimination against Women
- Subculture Theory and the American Society
Big thanks to your writing team for coming through for me with my last order. I didn’t give them a lot of notice, but they were able to come up with a superb paper for me. This is the kind of service that I love. Sometimes, I get forgetful, and I forget when my paper due dates are. It is so comforting to know that I can be in a rush and contact Essays-Writer.net and that you will deliver a great paper for me, no matter what. The fact that you include an anti-plagiarism report is great, too. I appreciate knowing that my work is totally original. Essays-Writer.net rocks!
Your writers are masters at time management. I turned in an order for four very difficult papers, and they were all written perfectly, even with the short deadline notice. Thanks, Essays-Writer.net!
Your writing company delivers for me every time. I have never been disappointed.
I was happy with the two essays that your writers did for me. Even though the subject matter was quite dense, they managed to come up with high quality work. This has been my experience with Essays-Writer.net, over the long haul. Each and every time I have needed a high quality paper, you have come through with outstanding writing examples for me. I am pleased to recommend your writing service to my friends and colleagues.
The work I received from your writers was much better than expected, especially considering the affordability of your services! This is so impressive! I wasn’t aware, previously, that companies like Essays-Writer.net even existed, but then again, I’m pretty sure you are the only one that is this good. I have heard a lot of bad things about other writing companies, but never a negative word about Essays-Writer.net. You are reputed as being the best, and I, for one, am convinced that this is true.Thank you for the outstanding job you did on my essay and research papers.