Support Live Chat
Nov 8, 2017 in Compare and Contrast
Ayurveda vs Allopathy
When people want to feel healthy, they look for the best doctors and approaches to curing. Ayurvedic treatment is based on the ancient Indian philosophy, while allopathy presents a western nowadays approach to treatment illnesses. Ayurvedic treatment is based on keeping up of both mental and physical harmony of the person, while allopathic approach tends to eliminate the disease quickly by intense influence on the body.
Ayurvedic science evolved way before our era. It is based on understanding the life and perception of it as for the following analysis. Ayurveda considers the health of the soul its primary objective, and the body state is resulting from it. Physical invasion, i.e. surgery, is the least wanted last measure in Ayurveda medicine. The Ayurveda knowledge comes from such trusted sources as saints and realized souls. Ayurvedic approach foresees lifetime care of mind and body.
Allopathy reflects the modern medicine with its scientific approach to curing. Its basic principle lies in eliminating the symptoms of the illness by replacing them with the opposite ones. It uses a three-step system of finding a hypothesis, observation and experimentation and finishes with conclusions. Its biggest gap is that as the new results of experiments are obtained, it can significantly change its principles. The allopathic system relies on the short-term operative intervention and treatment with possible side effects.
Ayurvedic system remains invariable for years, while allopathic one depends on the latest research results. Allopathy constantly finds the alternatives to what is used in the system, while Ayurveda provides stability and constant care of the patient.